A couple of years ago, I sat in a really interesting environmental seminar and listened to a lecture by one of the top professors from the University of California at Riverside. His talk was quite fascinating and it was on coral reefs, and some of the challenges they've had with bleaching. During his talk he sounded like a mouthpiece for the global warming groups.
He made some statements matter-of-factly that the degradation which was challenging the coral reefs around the world was due to mankind's pollution, and the acidification of the water. However, no matter how many questions I asked, he had no data to back that that or prove it, and yet it was as if it was a foregone conclusion, no longer a theory, and a fact of global warming. Okay so, let's talk about this for second shall we?
In Physorg (dot) com there was an article titled; "Declines in Caribbean coral reefs pre-date damage resulting from climate change," published on March 30, 2012 which stated; "The decline of Caribbean coral reefs has been linked to the recent effects of human-induced climate change. However, new research led by scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UCSD suggests an even earlier cause. The bad news - humans are still to blame. The good news - relatively simple policy changes can hinder further coral reef decline."
It actually figures that a climate warming period isn't to blame because many of these coral reefs are in waters which are quite warm, therefore they should actually do better if the planet's surface waters temperature heat up. What I think bothers me the most is that the scientists are not being truthful, honest, or even questioning their own data. They are so sure that global warming is real, they've almost taken it as a religion, and allowed academia to indoctrinate them into this belief system.
That's rather problematic for research scientists, but it is the reality. Next time a global warming alarmists tries to put forth information you know to be nonfactual, cut them off, stop them right there, and start asking questions; if they can't answer the questions, then challenge them some more. If they can't explain it to you in layman's terms, tell them that they are wrong straight to their face.
You see, we've been lied to long enough, and whether or not these researchers are purposely lying, or incompetent in their assessments doesn't make it okay. First, we shouldn't fund research scientist who are incompetent, and we definitely should not fund them if they are lying to us. Do you see that point? Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.
How to End Hunger and Starvation Instantly The Deadly Cherry Investigation The Hidden Tax: Regulations' Impact on Small Businesses and the Hampering of Progress Feeding a Growing World Population With the Aid of Science
No comments:
Post a Comment